KING’S SPOKESPERSON DENIES MONARCH’S INVOLVEMENT IN BODYGUARD’S RELEASE

Percy Simelane, King Mswati’s Spokesperson, has denied any involvement by the monarch in facilitating the release of Prince Majaha’s bodyguard, Mfungelwa Magonso Masilela, who is accused of raping and/or sodomizing a 13-year-old Ingatja. Simelane asserted that the courts operate independently and that the King does not interfere in judicial matters.

The statement was issued on Tuesday in response to inquiries from Swaziland News, following reports that Masilela, arrested last Thursday for the alleged crime, had been released from custody. Witnesses claimed to have seen the bodyguard at Manzana hotsprings in Ezulwini on Sunday, raising questions about the circumstances of his release. Masilela is reportedly one of the King’s “muti men,” individuals tasked with performing traditional rituals.

“We are not aware of Mr. Masilela’s release and the alleged conditions for his freedom,” Simelane stated. “We believe this is a matter dealt with by our courts, away from the King’s Office and the Head of State. Our experience is that he does not get involved in releasing suspect princes and princesses.”

Simelane emphasized the independence of Eswatini’s judiciary, stating, “We have no reason to believe it operates on public orders and opinions. If indeed the suspect in question was released, it was per the decision of the court he appeared before, probably on bail, and surely not because of his job within the Royal Family.”

The alleged crime and subsequent release of the suspect have sparked public outrage, with many questioning the impartiality of Eswatini’s judicial system. Critics argue that the monarchy’s influence often extends into legal matters, especially in cases involving individuals close to the royal family or its affiliates.

This incident has reignited debates about the transparency and independence of Eswatini’s judicial system. While the King’s Office denies involvement, the perception of privilege and preferential treatment for those connected to the monarchy continues to fuel discontent among ordinary citizens.

The victim, a 13-year-old Ingatja, represents one of the most vulnerable members of society, and the alleged crime has drawn condemnation from human rights groups. Advocates have called for a thorough investigation and accountability to ensure justice is served, irrespective of the accused’s ties to the royal family.

The lack of clarity surrounding Masilela’s release raises broader concerns about access to justice in Eswatini. Critics have long accused the judiciary of favoritism and a lack of accountability, particularly in cases involving individuals connected to the monarchy. This perception undermines public trust in the legal system and reinforces calls for reforms to ensure equal treatment under the law.

The King’s Office’s denial of involvement is unlikely to quell public skepticism, as many remain unconvinced about the independence of the judiciary. The incident has once again highlighted the complex interplay between traditional authority and modern governance in Eswatini, where allegations of royal privilege often overshadow assurances of impartiality.

As calls for justice grow louder, the handling of this case will serve as a litmus test for Eswatini’s judicial system. For many, it represents an opportunity to demonstrate the courts’ independence and commitment to upholding the rule of law. However, failure to address the public’s concerns could deepen existing frustrations and further erode trust in the nation’s institutions.

The victim’s family and human rights advocates continue to demand accountability and transparency. Whether justice will be served in this case remains to be seen, but the spotlight on Eswatini’s judiciary is unlikely to fade anytime soon. The country’s legal system faces a critical moment, one that will shape perceptions of its fairness and independence for years to come.